Without
meaning any disrespect, I have to say that Singapore has always felt like an
overly conservative place to me. It can even be considered tradition for
Singaporeans to choose only the most widely accepted route amidst fears of
being labeled an outcast or even belittled by others. But maybe it could be
time for change – and for people to realize that maybe the traditional way
isn’t really the best way for all individuals.
Since
youth, most of us have been brought up with the mindset that going to a Junior
College far exceeds any education you could receive at a Polytechnic. A Junior
College gives you a degree, which is highly sought after by Universities.
Junior College students are even given more priority in certain scenarios as
compared to Polytechnic students – for example, JC students still pay a
subsidized fee for public transport while Poly students pay a bloated fee and
are often forced to buy concession. Aren’t all us students the same age? Don’t
we go through the same problems? Why are we considered “adults” just because we
chose a differing education as compared to peers of our own age? Is this a form
of discrimination or just a show of ignorance?
Of
course, I am not at liberty to criticize anything too much because I might not
even fully understand the implications of the situation myself. But what really
bothers me is the mindset that people – especially those of the older
generations – seem to have regarding these two different education paths.
Let
me bring up some faults that Junior Colleges appear to have to me. Firstly, JC’s
require you to take a mesh of subjects that might not particularly interest you
or even have any benefit to you in the future. Maybe this variety of compulsory
subjects are suitable for somebody who has no inkling of what they want to
pursue in the future; however, most students would find at least one or two of
the subjects to be completely redundant and uninteresting to them.
Nevertheless, students are still expected to take on these subjects and are
forced to channel time and effort into preparing for them which they might
otherwise be able to use more productively or meaningfully. This is just a
colossal waste of time. Take, for example, Steve Jobs who dropped out of college
and only attended the classes that mattered to him – he didn’t become great by
following the syllabus because it was easier. He dared to do things that others
wouldn’t dare to do, he went against the book and reaped what he sowed. Well,
long story cut short, I think that this could be an example of becoming
successful by doing what really interests you.
Now,
secondly, everybody knows that a JC education is no bed of roses. Packed with
subject work and revision and many other things, JC students have barely enough
time for sleep. Is this approach of education really effective in molding
knowledgeable and efficient leaders for the future? Leaders in history don’t
become great because of the knowledge that has been continuously drilled into
their heads every second of the day – they become great because they were
equipped with a winning character and the right mentality. It doesn’t matter
how long and how much time you channel into work - if that work means nothing
to you, it can’t even be considered productive work. What really matters isn’t
how much time or effort you put into things. If you are clear about what you want
to do, or even have just an inkling of what interests you, then you can put in some
effort in the shortest span of time and still become more productive than
somebody with more time and effort invested in something impractical. Students
need some space, even amidst their education. None of us are robots who can
work non-stop and still be expected to remember every scrap of information that
is thrown at us. More importantly, most of us don’t even have to know half the stuff that we are expected to learn. So why
not pursue an education at an institute where you are only taught things that
are relevant to you without weighing down pressure like a ton of bricks?
Article from the Strait Times |
Polytechnic
gives students more freedom, that’s true – we aren’t constantly swamped with
work and faced with teachers breathing down our backs. But our modules aren’t
easy to handle at all – the only difference is that these are modules that
actually interest us. This freedom might seem condescending and might even said
by some to be a way to breed ‘lazy’ students, but I think that what it really
does is breed independence. The students are now in charge of their own lesson
times and personal commitments – almost like a stimulation of a real working
environment. Although poly lasts for one year longer than JC, students will
leave poly with a greater amount of relevant knowledge and the right habits to
tackle university life or even a working environment.
Well,
I realize that I might actually be rambling on right now. I don’t mean that JC
isn’t a good choice for further education – I just mean that it might not be
the best choice for everybody. I just think that if you more or less know what
you want to do with your life in the future, it might be more practical to
consider an education that can equip you with what you really need; pushing
against whatever public mindset there might be. Well, whatever the case, I hope
that you make the right choice completely devoid of any pressure you might have
from a recurrent stigma. Keep an open mind and I hope you
find the success that you deserve!
Thank you for your time!
Please don't hesitate to send in any of your own thoughts or feedback to Ordinarysgkid@hotmail.com or to follow me on twitter at @NatKathXo Comments on the article itself is welcomed too! Please share the article if you happen to find it interesting! :)
Credit: Google for Images. First: Unknown. Second: The Strait Times or Sp.edu.sg
Not bad at all; as a student who switched to poly just after 1+ months in a JC, I can say that I mostly thought along the same lines as you. But after almost two years in poly, I think more of the limitation that restricts success lies within ourselves. As you pointed out, great success stories have winning mentalities and strong character as their lifelong companions; now would this be limited by JCs or enhanced by polytechnics? I have no conclusivr idea, but from what I have experienced so far in poly and in JC, both institutions seem to have their share of loafers and hard-workers, and rote-thinkers and Einsteins. Some are nurtured to become better in polytechnic, some in JC. The toughness of JC life is the enjoyment of one and the bane of the other; the same goes for the freedom provided by a poly education. Inefficiencies will always be present; can you say that you've relished every single module you're doing? At the end of it all, what is better is really determined, I feel, by what is within us, and not the external environment. A loafer in JC would never find escape in poly; a hard worker in poly might just have a good time in JC and do well! In the end, life is the tester of man, and life looks not at the certificates possessed, but as you implied, the fruits that come from within.
ReplyDelete